You're right, it could be dangerous to call by this appelative.

But, we can make a name like: "USA external interventions 1946-2009", quite neutral title, there's a lot of info on Wkipedia we can use.

We insult no one, we just select public legal information from internet and wikipedia.

With regards,
Zeno

[maze1980]

Why Iraq? They had nothing to do with 9/11.

Why Afghanistan? They had nothing to do with 9/11 either.

Why Iraq? They had nothing to do with 9/11.

Why Afghanistan? They had nothing to do with 9/11 either.

Why Iraq?
Because of oil, both Exxon and British Petroleum need oil, USA and GB need oil. Iraq is a huge reservoir of oil.

Why Afghanistan?
Same reason like Ossama BinLaden. A soldier instructed to fight USSR (nowadays Russia) who discover its own conscience and rise the weapons against the "parent" who "educated" and "instructed" him.
You remember when Afghanistan was invaded by USSR and USA and NATO "prepared" the Afghanistan resistance, BinLaden included.

Same line was Castro in Cuba, son of a rich doctor, first "appreciated" friend of USA during Eisenhover...then...enemy

Our wonderful 'democratic system' is just another way of choosing which dictator we have in power over us. 2 million Brits came out on the streets of the UK to protest about the war in Iraq and Prime Minister Tony Blair just ignored the huge voice of the People when they said, "not in my name". That is not a free society. We will never be allowed to vote on anything important in our wonderful democracies. We just have the illusion of having a say.

I didn't say ' free society', I said 'democratic', which is a different thing. The fact that the majority wants something, doesn't mean I agree with them. But the majority still voted for Blair didn't they? Like they didn't know him .

Anyway... a bit off topic...

BTW... didn't download the app . And I bet I'm not in the list, I have a great disguise

[wapvirus]

Erm isn't this going a little off key i thought i was on prison planet for a while