mickielli15 wrote:Hi guys SKIN-DEVELOPERS. I have a problem. I do not know, which from your skins to use, because
all of them are excellent! I love Glikogliko-skin, Jocco, B1967, and so on...
I want to ask Glikogliko, I know that you have a lot work, but only if it is possible to set line-navi arrows to appear upstairs, now it appears in the middle and when I have most-tilt view,
would be fine to have these line-arrows on clear sky upstairs. If you will have a while to do it, I will be gratefull, butt even without this change I will use your skin very glad!!!
And another- in some skins, these line-navi arrows are smaller in night scheme - I have a solution - when I create folder NIGHT in folder "320x240", and copy every files (only files, not folders) from "320x240" and paste them to "NIGHT" folder, after that line-navi arrows appears same (bigger) size even in night scheme. Only for people, who want to got it like that.
Glikogliko, your skin evoke that I am stopping to miss TOMTOM NAVIGATOR, because with your skin I have TOMTOM with functions of IGO8, which is REALLY heartwarming, clarion, simply ingenious.
BIG THANKS TO ALL SKIN - MAKERS !!!
mickielli15, thanks for your recognition.
I positioned the lane arrows in the middle of the screen, because could be more important to foresee the upcoming road than watch the blue arrow, in that case.
I try to explain better: when the lane arrows appear, it means that a maneuver will be requested in a while. This means that probably there is a ramp, or a crossing or a junction. It should be important to be aware of that junction *and* have the lane arrows displayed. In that situation, the lane arrows will cover the blue navigation cursor, but you still can see in transparency.
I can arrange a version with lane arrows in the upper side of the screen, but I definitively don't like the choice.
And yes, I agree with you: I'm stopping to miss TomTom too

At the very beginning of the Igo8 usage, I told to a friend of mine that this software is well done, but has an horrible interface. How wrong I was.. I missed that this app can be fully customized.
The real thing I really miss is some documentation. At the moment any change is difficult due to high volume reverse -engineering work..
